Te Kete o Karaitiana Taiuru (Blog)

Tino Rangatiratanga

Māori Data Sovereignty: A definition

Update: All Māori Data Sovereignty posts have been combined and updated into a Compendium of Māori Data Sovereignty – https://www.taiuru.co.nz/compendium-of-maori-data-sovereignty/ 

Data sovereignty is:

  1. The concept that information/Data which has been converted and stored in digital form is subject to the laws of the country in which it is located.
  2. A person’s right to control access to, and disclosure of their own personal data.
  3. Typically refers to the understanding that data is subject to the laws of the nation within which it is stored.
  4. Perceives data as subject to the laws of the nation from which it is collected.

Māori Data sovereignty is:

  1. Data that is produced by Māori
  2. Data that is held by Māori, describes Māori and the environments we have relationships with, made by Māori or contains any Māori content or association including genetic material and digitised genetic material, inclusive of Information such as archives, records, DNA and images.
  3. Recognising that Māori data should be subject to Māori governance.
  4. Supporting tribal sovereignty and the realisation of Maori and Iwi aspirations.

Discussion

Māori Data Sovereignty issues often arise from Digital Colonialism. Many of the current concerns that surround data sovereignty relate to enforcing privacy regulations and preventing data that is stored in a foreign country from being subpoenaed by the host country’s government.

Data sovereignty relates to where data is stored and who owns or has access to it. Many people do not realise that much of New Zealand’s data is stored overseas in countries like America, Singapore and India where it is cheaper to store data. The more obvious issue that people do not consider is where the data is stored in their computers and social media and who actually owns that data and the fact that you have to pay an international company to store and access your own data from your computer.

A uniquely Indigenous issue is the data being digitised in the first place and the many breaches of tikanga and spirituality that occur when data such as images and names are digitised and shared on the web in places like FlikR, Twitter and Facebook all of whom claim ownership of your data and images in their end user agreements.

DISCLAIMER: This post is the personal opinion of Dr Karaitiana Taiuru and is not reflective of the opinions of any organisation that Dr Karaitiana Taiuru is a member of or associates with, unless explicitly stated otherwise.

3 responses to “Māori Data Sovereignty: A definition”

  1. eric brunner-williams Avatar

    as storage and jurisdiction are unlikely to coincide (the former following power and cooling, the latter not), indigenous intellectual property claims need to prevail, as non-indigenous intellectual property claims. this was my thought when proposing “sponsored” (here, by a pan-tribal board) registry type to icann.

    territorial jurisdictional issues with public health data is another extra-territorial application of originating jurisdiction policy.

  2. Kyle Avatar
    Kyle

    Karaitiana,
    How do you mean a strategic value?

    Does this piece suggest you desire an independent database of signifigant Maori value that is seperate & self funding of any NZ Govt intervention?

    Can tikanga really be digitalised? Can anything besides Te reo be digitalised?

    I’m not arguing, because I think all digital property of Maori should be governed by the originating Iwi.

    How much can you police the WORLD Wide Web though.

  3. Anita DEvi Avatar
    Anita DEvi

    In the past, IT has often been used in ways that some Māori believe breached Te Tiriti of Waitangi (and this may be happening still). Can you please give some examples of an issue which has been (or is) a concern to Māori .

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Archive